(source) |
Check out an exciting morning in Cedar Rapids. This building is kitty-corner to mine: http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/Cedar-Rapids-Building-Evacuated-Bomb-Squad-En-Route-to-Check-on-Suitcases-129526013.html
Turns out they were just the personal belongings of a homeless man (very sad, when you think about it), but I'm glad that the city took the situation serious.
I am not so pleased with the people who complain to no end during these incidences - saying it's disruptive, a waste of time and money, or, I love this one, "the terrorists have won."
<rolls eyes>
Yes, it costs money to send out the police, stop trains and traffic, and let the bomb squad play with their robot.
But it costs a bajillion times more if a bomb goes off:
- Loss of life has no price tag
- Disruption of a business is costly
- Heavy damage to a building (or surrounding structures) can tank a company
- No one thinks about secondary damage - sidewalks, roads, landscaping, street signs, utility poles ... someone has to pay for those to be fixed
- Events like these negatively impact an area's image - people may still want to visit the Statue of Liberty after 9/11, but not every city can sustain such a blow.
(source) |
The biggest cost overlooked is liability. Imagine if the police had pooh-poohed the suitcases and they had gone off as a bomb. Now the city is on the hook for not responding to a call. That company could then sue, and now you really are talking about taxpayer dollars.
At any rate, I'd much have a brouhaha made over nothing than to be complacent about a genuine threat.
No comments:
Post a Comment